Skip to main content

Review: Citizen Kane - 1941


INTRODUCTION
Yes. This is where I'm starting, right at the top. It's been lauded, analyzed, and lauded even more after further analysis. Critics raved, it's own posters proclaimed "It's Terrific," it has been called the best movie ever made. But here, I'm not going to discuss the meaning of Rosebud or sit Mr. Kane down on Freud's couch. I'm going to tell you, it's a spectacular film that I think the modern public will sleep through. 

 THE REVIEW
It features all the marks of a fantastic film. The tale being told is that of the rise and fall of newspaper tycoon, Charles Foster Kane, and the mystery of his last word, "Rosebud." Orson Welles is a superb director, he is able to pull the best performances out of his cast, the crowning jewel being his own. He is his character, he is Kane. That I feel was the gift of Orson Welles, he could become the character he played. The script he and Herman J. Mankiewicz co-wrote deserved the Oscar they received in 1942. It boasts thoughtful statements, fluent character development, and a unique flashback narrative structure. Gregg Toland's cinematography is gorgeous. The expressionistic use of lighting, the deep focus that allowed for visual clarity of everything in the shot. It is art, hands down. Composer Bernard Herrmann makes his debut to film scoring with everything I know and admire about him, his effectiveness via novel orchestration and his style of composition. It is eerie, beautiful, and rambunctious, it is a brilliant film score.

OPINION PIECE
Now, with all the perfection Citizen Kane boasts, why do I believe that if I showed this to a bunch of average moviegoers, I wouldn't have the same reaction as a bunch critics, or cinephiles like myself? The answer is: because of the film's own reputation. This is the greatest movie of all time on a technical level, hands down. Everything you see in theaters today can't touch this film, even if they tried. But ponder this; aren't statements like those just a little bit daunting? Wouldn't you be hyped to the Moon if you're told statements like those? So with a reputation like that, modern moviegoers are given expectations that aren't achievable. The films that receive accolades today are either giant CG spectacles or socially relevant films, both of which fall into certain formulas. Citizen Kane practically invented its own narrative structure, has little social relevance (beyond discussions of media manipulation), and is a spectacle of complexity, not scale.

 FINAL VERDICT
On the whole however, Citizen Kane is a brilliant film. It was a revolutionary motion picture that changed many areas of film-making, from writing to scoring. The only obstacle for many is the film's image. With all the praise this film receives, that image can be daunting. But for me, it earns that praise. I highly recommend this terrific film.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: The Plague Dogs - 1982

INTRODUCTION Oh...boy. This is one film I was excited to get. But I'm not disappointed. I'm just fascinated. The Plague Dogs is a 1982 animated adventure drama that tells the tale of two dogs that have escaped from a laboratory, and as they try to survive in the wild, they become the target of a hunt because they are perceived to be carrying the bubonic plague, creating two parallel narratives that overlap and intertwine. What fun! And for everyone's information, I am reviewing the ORIGINAL CUT. The 100-minute version that no one seems to want to watch. THE PROS First off, this film was directed by Martin Rosen. He was the same man behind the 1978 landmark animated feature Watership Down . These two features share much in common. Rosen at the helm when it came to direction, screenwriting, and producing. Both were based off of the work of the fantastic late author Richard Adams. And both feature the legendary late actor, Sir John Hurt. And with that, the acti...
Post a Comment
Read more

Double Feature: Clearwater Features's TUGS (1989) & Cosgrove Hall's The Wind in the Willows (1983 - 1988)

INTRODUCTION It's probably best that we dial things down and finally get around to talking about something I mention in the description of this godforsaken blog: TV! Namely 80s British children's programming! There's one major reason why I've chosen this unnaturally specific arena of the small screen...I grew up on it. Through the power of the internet, DVDs, and even syndicated broadcasts in the US in some instances, I was able to experience what kids from London to Lancaster watched during the days of Thatcher and the New Wave of British Heavy Metal. And I ate that stuff right up as a tot. There was something unique about English programming in general at the time. There was a certain homeliness to it. It was as if you return to your house or flat, turn on the tube, but it was catching an episode of Last of the Summer Wine or Only Fools & Horses that truly made you feel like you were at home. When it comes to kid's programming, I find that the UK is...
Post a Comment
Read more

Review: American Pop - 1981

INTRODUCTION  I must say this: I'm a fan of Ralph Bakshi, and I'm a fan of music. So put the two together, and that's a recipe for one happy me. And here to deliver the goods is the 1980 animated opus, American Pop , a tale of four generations of talent where only one comes out on top. THE PROS Okay then, where to begin with a piece like this? How about something along the lines of, "My God was that freaking amazing!" Those words were the first out of my mouth after having watched it, and those are words I stand by. I was blown away by this piece for how unashamedly ambitious it was. Conceptually, Ronni Kern's screenplay is an ingenious one, telling the tale of four men whose lives are intertwined with that of the music of their time, showing how sometimes honest-to-God hard work can all be for not, and success can sometimes come from what could be viewed as an "undignified" gateway. The stories are all reasonably developed, at least ...
Post a Comment
Read more