Skip to main content

Review: Citizen Kane - 1941


INTRODUCTION
Yes. This is where I'm starting, right at the top. It's been lauded, analyzed, and lauded even more after further analysis. Critics raved, it's own posters proclaimed "It's Terrific," it has been called the best movie ever made. But here, I'm not going to discuss the meaning of Rosebud or sit Mr. Kane down on Freud's couch. I'm going to tell you, it's a spectacular film that I think the modern public will sleep through. 

THE REVIEW
It features all the marks of a fantastic film. The tale being told is that of the rise and fall of newspaper tycoon, Charles Foster Kane, and the mystery of his last word, "Rosebud." Orson Welles is a superb director, he is able to pull the best performances out of his cast, the crowning jewel being his own. He is his character, he is Kane. That I feel was the gift of Orson Welles, he could become the character he played. The script he and Herman J. Mankiewicz co-wrote deserved the Oscar they received in 1942. It boasts thoughtful statements, fluent character development, and a unique flashback narrative structure. Gregg Toland's cinematography is gorgeous. The expressionistic use of lighting, the deep focus that allowed for visual clarity of everything in the shot. It is art, hands down. Composer Bernard Herrmann makes his debut to film scoring with everything I know and admire about him, his effectiveness via novel orchestration and his style of composition. It is eerie, beautiful, and rambunctious, it is a brilliant film score.

OPINION PIECE
Now, with all the perfection Citizen Kane boasts, why do I believe that if I showed this to a bunch of average moviegoers, I wouldn't have the same reaction as a bunch critics, or cinephiles like myself? The answer is: because of the film's own reputation. This is the greatest movie of all time on a technical level, hands down. Everything you see in theaters today can't touch this film, even if they tried. But ponder this; aren't statements like those just a little bit daunting? Wouldn't you be hyped to the Moon if you're told statements like those? So with a reputation like that, modern moviegoers are given expectations that aren't achievable. The films that receive accolades today are either giant CG spectacles or socially relevant films, both of which fall into certain formulas. Citizen Kane practically invented its own narrative structure, has little social relevance (beyond discussions of media manipulation), and is a spectacle of complexity, not scale.

FINAL VERDICT
On the whole however, Citizen Kane is a brilliant film. It was a revolutionary motion picture that changed many areas of film-making, from writing to scoring. The only obstacle for many is the film's image. With all the praise this film receives, that image can be daunting. But for me, it earns that praise. I highly recommend this terrific film.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Double Feature: Clearwater Features's TUGS (1989) & Cosgrove Hall's The Wind in the Willows (1983 - 1988)

INTRODUCTION It's probably best that we dial things down and finally get around to talking about something I mention in the description of this godforsaken blog: TV! Namely 80s British children's programming! There's one major reason why I've chosen this unnaturally specific arena of the small screen...I grew up on it. Through the power of the internet, DVDs, and even syndicated broadcasts in the US in some instances, I was able to experience what kids from London to Lancaster watched during the days of Thatcher and the New Wave of British Heavy Metal. And I ate that stuff right up as a tot. There was something unique about English programming in general at the time. There was a certain homeliness to it. It was as if you return to your house or flat, turn on the tube, but it was catching an episode of Last of the Summer Wine or Only Fools & Horses that truly made you feel like you were at home. When it comes to kid's programming, I find that the UK is...

Review: Fantastic Planet - 1973

INTRODUCTION As a fan of animation, I have found a bizarre safe haven of sorts in Europe. I have been shocked find some of the most creative, enchanting, and thought-provoking works of this medium in Europe. Anything, from the warped world of Jan Svankmajer to the dreamlike lands of Yuri Norstein. But the film for this review hails from France. Rene Laloux's La Planate Sauvage is a 1973 Franco-Czech animated science fiction film featuring the design work of imaginative illustrator Roland Topor. With the English title of Fantastic Planet , Laloux's cinematic debut is a truly fantastic tale. On the planet known as Ygam, Oms (or humans) are enslaved and toyed with by the planet's natives, large blue creatures called Draags. However, one Om by the name of Terr escapes his owner and finds himself in the company of radical Oms who defy the Draags. THE PROS La Planete Sauvage is film is chock full of allegories. From fighting oppression to the basic pleasures of gett...

Review: Ran - 1985

INTRODUCTION Akira Kurosawa is likely one of the most important filmmakers of the 20th century. Through his feudal films, we saw the works of Shakespeare reborn and new tales that have been told for decades. Through his modern day exploits, we looked into the heart of humanity at the time, peering into the souls of many. In his 1985 latter-day masterpiece Ran , we saw the best of both worlds. This is likely one of the most powerful pieces of film I've ever seen. I simply can't fathom one word against it. So I am going to bring you all on a tour of the elements of Ran , and how they are absolutely astonishing in execution and affect. Now this review will delve into mild spoilers, nothing too serious, but I highly recommend that you all watch this masterful film prior to reading. But if you do read through this, I hope it compels you to watch this gargantuan marvel of a motion picture, or heck, even rewatch it on account of this. STORY Akira Kurosawa's Ran is a 198...